Exploring / Exposing the Great Upset | Reset | Lockstep
“It has taken us centuries of thought and mockery to shake the medieval system; thought and mockery here and now are required to prevent the mechanists [technocrats] from building another.”
I suppose that most everyone has heard about Maritime Canada's lockout from its woods and forests,1 ostensibly to keep its woods and woodsy folk safe from fire and unattended injuries in them-there woods. See it's like this. Since all the paramedics are out fighting fires, someone might lie injured and helpless in the woods because there would be no one to rescue them.2 And since the alleged first duty of government is to keep us safe from injury, and since all the first responders are otherwise occupied (presumably fighting fires alongside trained and imported wildfire crews), we citizens and visitors gotta “get out of the woods and stay out of the woods.”3
HOWEVER, if you disobey and get caught (or snitched on) going into the woods, you could be arrested and potentially fined $25,000.00 (NS), or higher amounts in other provinces. But as one commenter (W411_fl0w3r)4 observed:
"If no one is coming to save you, then who's coming to arrest you?
So folks of the Maritimes (along with all the rest of Canada and the world), we ain’t going to “get out of the woods”5 of these marionettes masquerading as premiers, ministers, prime-ministers, presidents, and governors until we quit electing or appointing WEFian and R.I.C.E.-captured6 servitors of the control junkies. Any and every excuse (virtuous reason) is and will be used by “authorities” to inculcate blind obedience to their every order by parroting the mantras “health and safety,” “peace and safety,” “safe and effective.” BUT health, peace, safety, and virtue are not the goals. The agenda / goal of the hidden powers is total control of all humanity in order to pursue iniquity and abomination unhindered — without fear of exposure, censure, criticism.
Have we not seen enough unprosecuted or slap-on-the wrist or pardoned corruption and criminality? Time to clue in, expose, and prosecute, in the full light of day, their dark and choking woods.
P.S.: And why didn't some reporter call out the gas-fogging insinuation that paramedics and other local first-responders are the wildfire fighting teams?
(List to be finalized July 30, 2025 by Elections Canada)
Do you know any pretend candidate? Do they need to see this poster?
Do you know any consenting elector? Do they need to see this poster?
How to tell if you are a democracy mocker: i.e.: a consenting elector for a pretend candidate; a witness to a consenting elector for a pretend candidate; a solicitee of a fast-talking agent:
1. You signed as a consenting elector or witness on one or many pretend candidate nomination papers.
2. You don’t personally know (may have never even met) one or more of the pretend candidates you signed for.
3. You don’t intend to support, donate to, or vote for any of them.
4. You hope to hide your identity if the mockery is exposed too much.
5. You witnessed the signatures of consenting electors without using “due diligence to make sure that the signatures made in your presence are all by qualified electors who live in the electoral district” as required by the Elections Act.1
6. You knew the fast-talking agent was a Marxist / Leninist ideologue2; and if you didn’t know till now, you still allow your signature or witness to stand without request to rescind.
7. You think Marxist-Leninist ideologues care about Canadian electoral reform.
8. You think that abusers of process can be trusted with revamping the process.
Yes, our electoral process is in dire need of revamping and greater security, BUT in the present culture of corruption, R.I.C.E.-capture,3 and gullibility of officials, ideologues, and many of the public, what makes the Szuch boys think they (or some private / public group) have the incorruptible answer which they seem never yet to have defined or outlined?
Szuch-a-Suggestion:
Considering an agent's reporting requirements, perhaps several hundred or more Canadians who have a little cash to spare could donate one loonie to each of the pretend candidates. Send a money order totaling the number of pretend candidates and direct the agent to deposit your loonie donation into the campaign bank account of each of his “independent” candidates. Enclose a copy of the Elections Canada final candidate list for Battle-River-Crowfoot* so Tom Szuch... does not miss any of his independents. Keep a photo or print record of your instructions and donation (for proof if needed). Problem is: no one seems to have published a mailing address for their agent to receive donations to their campaigns! If you can find one, go for it!
1. Under 4.4 “Collecting Electors’ Signatures”
“All signatures must be collected and witnessed in Section F of the online nomination form or Nomination Paper. The witness must use due diligence to make sure that the signatures made in their presence are all by qualified electors who live in the electoral district. The witness does not need to be a qualified elector. This form allows for up to 10 signatures per page, and the same person must witness all elector signatures on any one page.”
https://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=pol&dir=can/bck&document=p5&lang=e#h18
2. Tomas & Kieran Szuchewycz
(List to be finalized July 30, 2025 by Elections Canada)
Do you know any of them? Do they need to see this poster?
How to tell if you are a democracy mocker: i.e.: pretend candidate, soliciting agent:
1.
You haven’t read: Becoming a Candidate: Manual for Candidates in a Federal Election1 2. Your agent hasn’t opened a campaign bank account for donations as required by Elections Canada.2
3. You have no campaign presence, plan, funds, or strategy.
4. You hide your identity as much as possible.3
5. Your solemn declaration is made without intent to perform as a candidate, to visit the riding, or to discover the concerns or issues of the riding electors.
6. You know your consenting electors have consented to dozens of other candidates and will not be voting for you.
7. Witnesses to the signatures of your consenting electors have not used “due diligence to make sure that the signatures made in their presence are all by qualified electors who live in the electoral district.”
8. Your agent is your controller / handler dictating where, when, or if you can speak publicly as a candidate.4
9. You knew your agent was a Marxist / Leninist ideologue5; and if you didn’t know till now, you still allow your signature to stand without request to rescind.
10. You don’t intend to submit financial reports6; and if you do, they will show minimal to zero candidate activity.
11. You think Marxist-Leninist ideologues care about Canadian electoral reform.
12. You think that abusers of process can be trusted with revamping the process.
Yes, our electoral process is in dire need of revamping and greater security, but in the present culture of corruption, R.I.C.E.-capture,7 and gullibility of officials, ideologues, and many of the public, what makes the Szuch boys think they (or some private / public group) have the incorruptible answer which they seem never yet to have defined or outlined?
Szuch-a-Suggestion:
Considering an agent's reporting requirements, perhaps several hundred or more Canadians who have a little cash to spare could donate one loonie to each of the pretend candidates. Send a money order totaling the number of pretend candidates and direct the agent to deposit your loonie donation into the campaign bank account of each of his “independent” candidates. Enclose a copy of the Elections Canada final candidate list for Battle River-Crowfoot* so Tom Szuch... does not miss any of his independents. Keep a photo or print record of your instructions and donation (for proof if needed). Problem is: no one seems to have published a mailing address for their agent to receive donations to their campaigns! If you can find one, go for it!
Another Look at State-abetted / -protected PSRS1 patterning
PROBLEM:
• not enough underage victims to satisfy demand (or to carry out agendas of compromise or ritual)
• not enough beautiful, naïve, teen-thru-twenties males and females to satisfy demand (or to carry out agendas of compromise or ritual);
• not enough power, gain, glory, and domination to satisfy demand;
• not enough “authorities”2 or potential “authorities” compromised or blackmailed for purposes of achieving more power, gain, glory, and domination;
• too much free speech, critical thinking, resistance to domination, etc.;
• too much uncontrolled chaos;
• not enough conformity.
SETUP:
• honey-pot, yacht-op, party-op, surveil, record/video, replace/remove every “authority” (or other person) that might resist, or unfavorably impact a planned operation designed to increase power, gain, glory, and domination;
• threaten with: 1) exposure of shameful character (whether real or fabricated); or 2) violence against loved ones, pets, property, self, etc.
• recruit, seduce or groom naïve, insecure sidekicks to do (need-to-know) actions for the “greater good” (AND for later cover, blame-shifting, and execution to avoid exposure of the operation);
• psy-op, street-op, false-flag, lie to, and gas-fog everyone.
REACTION:
• FEAR;
• compliance;
• conformity;
• silence;
• belief in fabricated narratives;
• increased pleas for peace, order, and safety.
SOLUTION:
• less speech;
• less critical thinking;
• more criticism / cancellation of critical thinkers by media and the public;
• more justification and calls for restraint, restriction, suspension of Rights;
• more power, gain, glory, and domination for the “powers.”
LESSONS TO BE LEARNED:
• KNOW that psychopathic Utopians and unfathomable evil exist and are widespread (just listen to the news and court cases).
• KNOW, if you are any type of authority, or potential authority, that you are or will be, at some point, under constant phone, internet, or other surveillance; and exposed to constant honey-pot offers.
• ACT accordingly with such awareness.
• Don’t be naïve.
• Don’t be seduced by praise or promises of power, gain, or glory.
• Discern and refuse the honey-pots, yacht-ops, party-ops, and R.I.C.E.3 temptations.
• Live not by lies.
• Repent and confess when errors are made or crimes committed.
• Live so as to trust in Divine Providence and Protection.
• KNOW that many public kills of active shooters are of patsies while their highly-trained SF handlers (actual shooters) escape and are protected.
The pattern just repeats and repeats (as even now in Idaho) because WE THE PEOPLE have been so ready to believe lies; so seduced by so-called intelligence/defence/enforcement agencies; so lax in demanding full exposure, accountability, justice, and judgment.
Thus, we have all become assets to the power-gain-glory-domination Utopians by letting ourselves be compromised; by believing false narratives; by becoming sidekicks; by responding with
• FEAR
• compliance
• conformity
• silence
• increased pleas for peace, order, and safety.
It’s time we understood the PSRS pattern and ceased being both witting or unwitting assets.
[A heads-up for: 1) the Republican Party of Alberta (RPA)1 and their supporters / believers in “Pro-Americanism Conservatism”; & 2) all other alleged Republics worldwide]
Summary:
▪ Power resides with the people through their elected representatives;
▪ Governance based on the rule of law and the public good;
▪ Popular sovereignty through free and fair elections;
▪ Leaders are accountable to the people;
▪ No one is above the law;
▪ System of checks and balances against power-abuse through legislative, executive, judicial separation of powers.
So, how does one pretend Republicanism?
First, you create or find a Republican structure, e.g.:
▪ a House of Representatives or of Commons, etc.; with or without an effective Senate or upper body (Legislative branch)
▪ a president and sometimes a vice-president or equivalents (Executive branch)
▪ a judiciary (Judicial branch)
▪ a Constitution
Second, you R.I.C.E.2-capture the majority (specifically, the most powerful and conscienceless) of elected representatives, appointed officials, and media so they represent and push your power-gain-glory-domination interests and agendas instead of the interests and good of constituents, state, or nation.
Third, you censor / malign / prosecute complainants of pretense or hypocrisy in Republicanism.
Fourth, you put your Psychological Operations Team (POT) into perpetual loop to repeat ad nauseam the terms: “conspiracy theorist,” “safe and effective,” “expert,” “build back better,” “peace and safety,” “wildfire,” “lone gunman,” “DEI,”3 “ESG,”4 “CEI,”5 and whatever other mantras that simulation exercises have regurgitated or will yet regurgitate.
Fifth, you false-flag6 and gas-fog7 your way into manufactured, coerced, or pretended consent for oppressive, keep-us-safe-from-all-risk-at-all-costs legislation.
Sixth, and last but far from least, you re-elect, (year after year with a 3M strategy of money, mendacity, and mischief), R.I.C.E.-captured servitors of power, gain, glory, and domination.
So RPA, you may want to re-evaluate your assumptions about Pro-Americanism Conservatism. The facts tell us that the USian Republicanism system has tragically become a pretend Republic — a Republic that continues to tout many laudable things, but ends up doing what Mike Pompeo bragged: “we lied, we cheated, we stole.”9 He didn’t mention “we murdered,” but he could have if he were admitting the whole truth.
It’s time we woke to reality in Canada, the U.S. and most of the world.
[If you want to understand the depth of capture and corruption, research the numerous books at thedukereport.substack.com8 (just one of many critical thinkers who has accumulated a lot of exposé material in one easily accessible place).]
Despite the synonyms, someone chose the name artificial to precede intelligence and then to hype this “artificial intelligence” as a neutral, fact-based, logical arbiter of all things true and just — (an invention of men & womenthat someone else envisioned as the coming-god of “a single right answer”2) — an “omniscient intelligence” that could sort through all forks and fallacies and present the questioner with the one and pure truth. No more multiple-answer “bugs”3 that confuse, distract, deceive.
Now don’t misunderstand. AI can do marvelous things with sufficient training and programming by we “creatures made flesh”— we creatures who, from recorded time, have fallen, all too frequently, (like Cain perhaps) into the enticements of R.I.C.E.: Reward. Ideology. Coercion[/Compromise/Corruption]. Ego.4 Thus, recent headlines have made me ponder on the equivalencies of R.I.C.E. for our software servitors — servitors that some claim are bound to become our masters; yea, our superiors (except superiors in what?).
What causes AI to make things up (hallucinate?! as some characterize it10)? If AI has no “scruples” in making up fake court citations and cases, fake books for summer reading, fake resumes, etc., etc., are we fools to enshrine and trust AI in health diagnostics, as financial wizards, as educators, librarians, editors, pastors, summarizers, negotiators, and on and on? If humanshaven't much improved in their moral scruples over millions(?) of years, do we think AI (an invention and trainee of such flawed beings) is going to achieve perfection within another year or two or three of more exponential training?
For too long we have been programmed to trust in the potentials and miracles of AI. Maybe we should take time to listen to a few questioning voices:
Could it be that the namers of AI were unwitting wise men and prognosticators per the proverb of Confuscius?
“The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name”
which we seem to have unwittingly done. So, let us ask: How artificially intelligent is it to make things up that can be so readily fact-checked? How many geniuses have turned into our worst criminals? Are we being gas-fogged11 again so humans can do their natural man,12 “Cain-thing” (you know: "steal, kill, and destroy") and then blame some unaccountable AI?
[*Agent for circa 86 independent candidates listed on the long ballot (91 names) of Carleton (Ontario) — riding of Conservative leader Poilievre.]
First, a few questions for Tom:
You want a permanent non-partisan committee to handle elections, eh?1 How non-partisan are you? How non-partisan your “protest” committee? As non-partisan as the five advance poll-workers who lugged flimsy, cardboard polling boxes to their cars and then drove off into the late afternoon traffic in different directions for ballot “safe-keeping”?2 As safe as all those other advance poll, flimsy boxes scattered across Canada, taped shut on the edges and top while being kept “safe” until counting day? As secure as all those surplus ballots waiting somewhere between advance poll and April 28?
Do you really think, in the massive corruption and dishonesty that we have witnessed in the last 9 years — the corruption and dishonesty that plagues our world today — that your committee could find 100% non-partisan citizens who can be trusted to act non-partisanly (even when they are really partisan) to cover a Canadian election when so many people are invested in a certain outcome?
Would you mind posting on your social media, how non-partisans vote?
And, yes, of course, you ran out of time and resources to spread your long-ballot protest to the other leaders’ ridings because you were too busy loading fake candidates in ONE riding3 — Poilievre’s Carleton — as agent for how many phony independents4? 86?
You really meant to load the Lib, NDP, and Green leader ballots, too, with pretend candidates, did you? Honest? Really? And honest! really! you think it doesn’t make a difference to have 4 or 5 on a ballot versus 91? Maybe you should read some studies about long ballots, complexity, accessibility, and voter overwhelm, etc.5 And maybe you should self-reflect on whether you are a duper / dupee in the R.I.C.E.6 ratpack of heads and tails.
How could we ever trust you to take charge of election matters when you have so egregiously abused the process? How could we ever trust people “hired” by you, like those 86 independents who consented to be fake candidates7 at your R.I.C.E.d instigation? Have you doxed them to their shame and risk by having their names blazoned on the internet for the world to witness their dishonesty and puppetry? Are those the kind of non-partisan folks you would hire for election oversight?
If you don’t live in the Carleton riding, could we class your “agency” as foreign interference? Do you have foreign affiliates who guided you? Frankly, your “reasons” for long ballot feels just like another case of classic gas-fogging7?
Now an URGENT REQUEST for transparency and accountability to Elections Canada. Please publish on your website asap for each and every riding:
1. the # of voters on or added to the voters list who actually cast a ballot;
2. the number of ballots counted or spoiled in each riding;
3. the number of ballots printed for each riding;
4. the number of ballots remaining after polls closed;
5. begin the transparency with the ridings for Carney and Poilievre;
6. ascertain any and all discrepancies;
7. immediately and openly advise all Canadians of the results;
8. if there are discrepancies turn over all data asap to the police for investigation
So much of what we are seeing these days in allegedly free and democratic nations is gas-fogging by authorities. The front-line proxies for the “powers” insist that their target for persecution or persuasion believe what they are alleging, contrary to the evidence before every eye. Having agreed for money to play the puppet, the proxies deny every invitation to exercise critical thinking and instead insist that “legal” (i.e., illegal) fictions are fact and that statements of fact are hate speech — except those claims are just more classic gas-fogging contortions of projecting hatred of another person’s speech back upon the speaker (as in motive) in order to shut down all questions, dissent, and thought.
Please, people, let us recognize gas-fogging when we see it and call it out.
People, People of Canada, are we really going to keep up this mockery of democratic government by pretending amnesia? Are we really going to vote back into office a party that has undemocratically evaded accountability1 (for the last decade) just because it has now changed its face (though not its agenda). Justin Trudeau was a mere WEF-indoctrinated believer (puppet2) in the ideology of post-nationalism, but Mark Carney is a member of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Foundation (WEF)3 whose gospel is post-nationalism and climate-as-control. And what is post-nationalism? you ask? In short, it is the end of nation states. It is the drive to One World Government run “efficiently” by experts and technocrats fronting as “doges”4 — you know, those sycophantic servitors of the insuperable oligarchs.
Let’s take a closer look at the MOCKERY:
1. A government that shuts down police investigations into corruption (in both public and private sectors) and heavily redacts documents they are compelled to release concerning those alleged corruptions.5
2. A party leader who can prorogue (cancel sittings of) Parliament in order to avoid questions, accountability, and a vote of non-confidence, thus holding onto power and the purse strings that fund travel, ego, (imagined) legacy enhancements, and a last-ditch, attempt to enforce an illegal capital-gains hike,6 etc., etc.
3. A country where its beleaguered leader can obtain a prorogue of Parliament from a single individual (a Governor General), whose appointment and tenure is essentially by the recommendation of that beleaguered leader7 — a prorogue intensely opposed by the vast majority of Canadians.
4. A party that raises its earnest fee for a leadership “race” from $75,000.00 (2020) to $350,000.00 (2025)8 thus making it a rich (wo)man’s game, except, of course, for two unacceptably rich leadership hopefuls8a who were disqualified, apparently for French insufficiency, thus, narrowing the field to a manageable four — being three WEF-clones out of four.
5. A party, with a reported 400,000 registered members, disqualifies, without explanation, two thirds of them from voting for their new party leader.9
6. A party that rejects two sitting incumbents (women) in order to anoint a “political outsider” who is deeply steeped in the inner politics of Global Banking, corporate profits ‘n profiteering, Climate Doom, World Order (aka WO), R.I.C.E.,10 etc,. etc..
7. Calling a man “Prime Minister” who was only “elected” by a fringe of his party members and none of the other general electorate — a man who does not yet meet the definition of a minister, let alone “Prime Minister.”11
8. A party leader, prematurely called Prime Minister, who hides behind “rules” to avoid revealing conflicts of interest and other unpleasant facts12 until after an election that he asks the loyal GG to announce (best suited to his timing and probability for election).
9. A party or leader who pretends there is no divided loyalty (i,e., conflict of interest) between WEFian / globalist ideology and Canadian values, interests and Nationalism — i.e., ignoring / suppressing the “serving two masters” axiom fact.13
10. Leaders that promise or pledge billions in aid, sympathy, or support to countries and projects14 without vote, oversight, or critical exposure by a sitting parliament or by a captured, multi- billion-dollar-funded press.15
11. Press Cases:
Case One: CBC Reporter to Mark Carney: [in essence] Will you be revealing your conflicts of interest before the election ...
Mark Carney: “Look within yourself, Rosemary…”16
Case Two: Reporter to Mark Carney: [in essence] Will you repay Canadians your European travel costs?
Mark Carney: [Lengthy word salad at its greenest]
Reporter: I will take that as a “no.”
Mark Carney: “NO. YOU WILL TAKE THAT as a very comprehensive answer to your question.”17
12. A party who, after disqualifying a sitting MP from running for leadership, then disqualifies him from running for re-election in his own riding and parachutes the pretend PM into the Liberal spot on the ballot.18
13. A party leader declines an invitation to attend an up-coming leader’s debate in the French language because of (perhaps?) French insufficiency19 (see point 4 above).
14. A country whose Senate members (chamber of “sober second-thought”) are to represent (in theory) their provinces and regions but who are appointed by the nation’s PM without required reference or preference by the province or region; Senators who are often appointed as a perk for loyalty to the presiding PM’s party.
15. A country whose Senate is composed as in this map.
Canadian Senate Seats by Region Source: thecanadaguide.com
So dear Canadians, let us end this mockery of our damaged, disintegrating, quasi-democracy. Let us reject the past decade of mockery / hypocrisy and give someone else a go at resisting the corruptions of power. And with our NEW MPs, let us keep a Mockery Watch. Call out every case of DeMOCracy / hypocrisy; insist on integrity, fairness, justice, and judgment for both the Right and the Left.
Let’s commit, as an entire nation, to right the wrongs that have evolved within our confederate structure.20 Let us revive the Triple-E Senate21 concept of equal / elected / effective by province / territory. Let us Improve our House of Commons representation by achieving greater accuracy in assessing the number of lawful, citizen voters.22
Let us insist on achieving fair representation. Let us let go of the fight to hold onto power and privilege at the cost of integrity. Let us be as fair to our neighbor as we would wish them to be fair to us.
IMAGE:
Cartoonist: Wm. Charles Morris | 1906-1908
Re-purposed by SMS | 2025
Hatband reads: LIB
Unseen inside hatband:
conspirators, accomplices, perpetrators, sycophants, script-readers
Page URL: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WCMorris_Spokesman-Review_cartoons_124.jpg
File URL: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/WCMorris_Spokesman-Review_cartoons_124.jpg
Attribution: William Charles Morris, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Description: Editorial cartoon by William C. Morris.
Date: circa 1906 – 1908
Source: Morris, William Charles (1908) Spokesman-Review Cartoons, Spokane, WA: Review Publishing Company
Permission: This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer
Author: Morris, William Charles 1874-1940
William Charles Morris (March 6, 1874–April 10, 1940) was an American political cartoonist. Born in Salt Lake City, Utah, he began his career with the Salt Lake Herald and later worked as cartoonist with The Spokesman-Review in Spokane, from 1904 to 1913,[1] after which he worked for such publications as New-York Tribune, New York Mail, the George Matthew Adams Syndicate, and Harper's Weekly.[2] He was on the publicity staff of the Republican National Committee during the 1936 presidential campaign. He died of heart attack at Nyack, New York, April 10, 1940, at age 66.[3] | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Charles_Morris
2025 Changes by SMS:
• Removed text: 1) "FOR W.J. BRYAN" from coffin end; 2) "HEARST" from hatband; 3) "News Item — A break has occurred in the former close friendship between Wm. J. Bryan and Wm. R. Hearst"
• Added: 1) Re- to Hearsed (Title); 2) "Canada, 1867-2025 to coffin end; 3} LIB” to hatband. (If the inside of the hatband could be seen, it would read: conspirators, accomplices, perpetrators, sycophants, script-readers); 4) “WEF+” and “Global Services” to hearse side.
