Exploring / Exposing the Great Upset | Reset | Lockstep
“It has taken us centuries of thought and mockery to shake the medieval system; thought and mockery here and now are required to prevent the mechanists [technocrats] from building another.”
Another Look at State-abetted / -protected PSRS1 patterning
PROBLEM:
• not enough underage victims to satisfy demand (or to carry out agendas of compromise or ritual)
• not enough beautiful, naïve, teen-thru-twenties males and females to satisfy demand (or to carry out agendas of compromise or ritual);
• not enough power, gain, glory, and domination to satisfy demand;
• not enough “authorities”2 or potential “authorities” compromised or blackmailed for purposes of achieving more power, gain, glory, and domination;
• too much free speech, critical thinking, resistance to domination, etc.;
• too much uncontrolled chaos;
• not enough conformity.
SETUP:
• honey-pot, yacht-op, party-op, surveil, record/video, replace/remove every “authority” (or other person) that might resist, or unfavorably impact a planned operation designed to increase power, gain, glory, and domination;
• threaten with: 1) exposure of shameful character (whether real or fabricated); or 2) violence against loved ones, pets, property, self, etc.
• recruit, seduce or groom naïve, insecure sidekicks to do (need-to-know) actions for the “greater good” (AND for later cover, blame-shifting, and execution to avoid exposure of the operation);
• psy-op, street-op, false-flag, lie to, and gas-fog everyone.
REACTION:
• FEAR;
• compliance;
• conformity;
• silence;
• belief in fabricated narratives;
• increased pleas for peace, order, and safety.
SOLUTION:
• less speech;
• less critical thinking;
• more criticism / cancellation of critical thinkers by media and the public;
• more justification and calls for restraint, restriction, suspension of Rights;
• more power, gain, glory, and domination for the “powers.”
LESSONS TO BE LEARNED:
• KNOW that psychopathic Utopians and unfathomable evil exist and are widespread (just listen to the news and court cases).
• KNOW, if you are any type of authority, or potential authority, that you are or will be, at some point, under constant phone, internet, or other surveillance; and exposed to constant honey-pot offers.
• ACT accordingly with such awareness.
• Don’t be naïve.
• Don’t be seduced by praise or promises of power, gain, or glory.
• Discern and refuse the honey-pots, yacht-ops, party-ops, and R.I.C.E.3 temptations.
• Live not by lies.
• Repent and confess when errors are made or crimes committed.
• Live so as to trust in Divine Providence and Protection.
• KNOW that many public kills of active shooters are of patsies while their highly-trained SF handlers (actual shooters) escape and are protected.
The pattern just repeats and repeats (as even now in Idaho) because WE THE PEOPLE have been so ready to believe lies; so seduced by so-called intelligence/defence/enforcement agencies; so lax in demanding full exposure, accountability, justice, and judgment.
Thus, we have all become assets to the power-gain-glory-domination Utopians by letting ourselves be compromised; by believing false narratives; by becoming sidekicks; by responding with
• FEAR
• compliance
• conformity
• silence
• increased pleas for peace, order, and safety.
It’s time we understood the PSRS pattern and ceased being both witting or unwitting assets.
[A heads-up for: 1) the Republican Party of Alberta (RPA)1 and their supporters / believers in “Pro-Americanism Conservatism”; & 2) all other alleged Republics worldwide]
Summary:
▪ Power resides with the people through their elected representatives;
▪ Governance based on the rule of law and the public good;
▪ Popular sovereignty through free and fair elections;
▪ Leaders are accountable to the people;
▪ No one is above the law;
▪ System of checks and balances against power-abuse through legislative, executive, judicial separation of powers.
So, how does one pretend Republicanism?
First, you create or find a Republican structure, e.g.:
▪ a House of Representatives or of Commons, etc.; with or without an effective Senate or upper body (Legislative branch)
▪ a president and sometimes a vice-president or equivalents (Executive branch)
▪ a judiciary (Judicial branch)
▪ a Constitution
Second, you R.I.C.E.2-capture the majority (specifically, the most powerful and conscienceless) of elected representatives, appointed officials, and media so they represent and push your power-gain-glory-domination interests and agendas instead of the interests and good of constituents, state, or nation.
Third, you censor / malign / prosecute complainants of pretense or hypocrisy in Republicanism.
Fourth, you put your Psychological Operations Team (POT) into perpetual loop to repeat ad nauseam the terms: “conspiracy theorist,” “safe and effective,” “expert,” “build back better,” “peace and safety,” “wildfire,” “lone gunman,” “DEI,”3 “ESG,”4 “CEI,”5 and whatever other mantras that simulation exercises have regurgitated or will yet regurgitate.
Fifth, you false-flag6 and gas-fog7 your way into manufactured, coerced, or pretended consent for oppressive, keep-us-safe-from-all-risk-at-all-costs legislation.
Sixth, and last but far from least, you re-elect, (year after year with a 3M strategy of money, mendacity, and mischief), R.I.C.E.-captured servitors of power, gain, glory, and domination.
So RPA, you may want to re-evaluate your assumptions about Pro-Americanism Conservatism. The facts tell us that the USian Republicanism system has tragically become a pretend Republic — a Republic that continues to tout many laudable things, but ends up doing what Mike Pompeo bragged: “we lied, we cheated, we stole.”9 He didn’t mention “we murdered,” but he could have if he were admitting the whole truth.
It’s time we woke to reality in Canada, the U.S. and most of the world.
[If you want to understand the depth of capture and corruption, research the numerous books at thedukereport.substack.com8 (just one of many critical thinkers who has accumulated a lot of exposé material in one easily accessible place).]
Despite the synonyms, someone chose the name artificial to precede intelligence and then to hype this “artificial intelligence” as a neutral, fact-based, logical arbiter of all things true and just — (an invention of men & womenthat someone else envisioned as the coming-god of “a single right answer”2) — an “omniscient intelligence” that could sort through all forks and fallacies and present the questioner with the one and pure truth. No more multiple-answer “bugs”3 that confuse, distract, deceive.
Now don’t misunderstand. AI can do marvelous things with sufficient training and programming by we “creatures made flesh”— we creatures who, from recorded time, have fallen, all too frequently, (like Cain perhaps) into the enticements of R.I.C.E.: Reward. Ideology. Coercion[/Compromise/Corruption]. Ego.4 Thus, recent headlines have made me ponder on the equivalencies of R.I.C.E. for our software servitors — servitors that some claim are bound to become our masters; yea, our superiors (except superiors in what?).
What causes AI to make things up (hallucinate?! as some characterize it10)? If AI has no “scruples” in making up fake court citations and cases, fake books for summer reading, fake resumes, etc., etc., are we fools to enshrine and trust AI in health diagnostics, as financial wizards, as educators, librarians, editors, pastors, summarizers, negotiators, and on and on? If humanshaven't much improved in their moral scruples over millions(?) of years, do we think AI (an invention and trainee of such flawed beings) is going to achieve perfection within another year or two or three of more exponential training?
For too long we have been programmed to trust in the potentials and miracles of AI. Maybe we should take time to listen to a few questioning voices:
Could it be that the namers of AI were unwitting wise men and prognosticators per the proverb of Confuscius?
“The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name”
which we seem to have unwittingly done. So, let us ask: How artificially intelligent is it to make things up that can be so readily fact-checked? How many geniuses have turned into our worst criminals? Are we being gas-fogged11 again so humans can do their natural man,12 “Cain-thing” (you know: "steal, kill, and destroy") and then blame some unaccountable AI?
[*Agent for circa 86 independent candidates listed on the long ballot (91 names) of Carleton (Ontario) — riding of Conservative leader Poilievre.]
First, a few questions for Tom:
You want a permanent non-partisan committee to handle elections, eh?1 How non-partisan are you? How non-partisan your “protest” committee? As non-partisan as the five advance poll-workers who lugged flimsy, cardboard polling boxes to their cars and then drove off into the late afternoon traffic in different directions for ballot “safe-keeping”?2 As safe as all those other advance poll, flimsy boxes scattered across Canada, taped shut on the edges and top while being kept “safe” until counting day? As secure as all those surplus ballots waiting somewhere between advance poll and April 28?
Do you really think, in the massive corruption and dishonesty that we have witnessed in the last 9 years — the corruption and dishonesty that plagues our world today — that your committee could find 100% non-partisan citizens who can be trusted to act non-partisanly (even when they are really partisan) to cover a Canadian election when so many people are invested in a certain outcome?
Would you mind posting on your social media, how non-partisans vote?
And, yes, of course, you ran out of time and resources to spread your long-ballot protest to the other leaders’ ridings because you were too busy loading fake candidates in ONE riding3 — Poilievre’s Carleton — as agent for how many phony independents4? 86?
You really meant to load the Lib, NDP, and Green leader ballots, too, with pretend candidates, did you? Honest? Really? And honest! really! you think it doesn’t make a difference to have 4 or 5 on a ballot versus 91? Maybe you should read some studies about long ballots, complexity, accessibility, and voter overwhelm, etc.5 And maybe you should self-reflect on whether you are a duper / dupee in the R.I.C.E.6 ratpack of heads and tails.
How could we ever trust you to take charge of election matters when you have so egregiously abused the process? How could we ever trust people “hired” by you, like those 86 independents who consented to be fake candidates7 at your R.I.C.E.d instigation? Have you doxed them to their shame and risk by having their names blazoned on the internet for the world to witness their dishonesty and puppetry? Are those the kind of non-partisan folks you would hire for election oversight?
If you don’t live in the Carleton riding, could we class your “agency” as foreign interference? Do you have foreign affiliates who guided you? Frankly, your “reasons” for long ballot feels just like another case of classic gas-fogging7?
Now an URGENT REQUEST for transparency and accountability to Elections Canada. Please publish on your website asap for each and every riding:
1. the # of voters on or added to the voters list who actually cast a ballot;
2. the number of ballots counted or spoiled in each riding;
3. the number of ballots printed for each riding;
4. the number of ballots remaining after polls closed;
5. begin the transparency with the ridings for Carney and Poilievre;
6. ascertain any and all discrepancies;
7. immediately and openly advise all Canadians of the results;
8. if there are discrepancies turn over all data asap to the police for investigation
So much of what we are seeing these days in allegedly free and democratic nations is gas-fogging by authorities. The front-line proxies for the “powers” insist that their target for persecution or persuasion believe what they are alleging, contrary to the evidence before every eye. Having agreed for money to play the puppet, the proxies deny every invitation to exercise critical thinking and instead insist that “legal” (i.e., illegal) fictions are fact and that statements of fact are hate speech — except those claims are just more classic gas-fogging contortions of projecting hatred of another person’s speech back upon the speaker (as in motive) in order to shut down all questions, dissent, and thought.
Please, people, let us recognize gas-fogging when we see it and call it out.
People, People of Canada, are we really going to keep up this mockery of democratic government by pretending amnesia? Are we really going to vote back into office a party that has undemocratically evaded accountability1 (for the last decade) just because it has now changed its face (though not its agenda). Justin Trudeau was a mere WEF-indoctrinated believer (puppet2) in the ideology of post-nationalism, but Mark Carney is a member of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Foundation (WEF)3 whose gospel is post-nationalism and climate-as-control. And what is post-nationalism? you ask? In short, it is the end of nation states. It is the drive to One World Government run “efficiently” by experts and technocrats fronting as “doges”4 — you know, those sycophantic servitors of the insuperable oligarchs.
Let’s take a closer look at the MOCKERY:
1. A government that shuts down police investigations into corruption (in both public and private sectors) and heavily redacts documents they are compelled to release concerning those alleged corruptions.5
2. A party leader who can prorogue (cancel sittings of) Parliament in order to avoid questions, accountability, and a vote of non-confidence, thus holding onto power and the purse strings that fund travel, ego, (imagined) legacy enhancements, and a last-ditch, attempt to enforce an illegal capital-gains hike,6 etc., etc.
3. A country where its beleaguered leader can obtain a prorogue of Parliament from a single individual (a Governor General), whose appointment and tenure is essentially by the recommendation of that beleaguered leader7 — a prorogue intensely opposed by the vast majority of Canadians.
4. A party that raises its earnest fee for a leadership “race” from $75,000.00 (2020) to $350,000.00 (2025)8 thus making it a rich (wo)man’s game, except, of course, for two unacceptably rich leadership hopefuls8a who were disqualified, apparently for French insufficiency, thus, narrowing the field to a manageable four — being three WEF-clones out of four.
5. A party, with a reported 400,000 registered members, disqualifies, without explanation, two thirds of them from voting for their new party leader.9
6. A party that rejects two sitting incumbents (women) in order to anoint a “political outsider” who is deeply steeped in the inner politics of Global Banking, corporate profits ‘n profiteering, Climate Doom, World Order (aka WO), R.I.C.E.,10 etc,. etc..
7. Calling a man “Prime Minister” who was only “elected” by a fringe of his party members and none of the other general electorate — a man who does not yet meet the definition of a minister, let alone “Prime Minister.”11
8. A party leader, prematurely called Prime Minister, who hides behind “rules” to avoid revealing conflicts of interest and other unpleasant facts12 until after an election that he asks the loyal GG to announce (best suited to his timing and probability for election).
9. A party or leader who pretends there is no divided loyalty (i,e., conflict of interest) between WEFian / globalist ideology and Canadian values, interests and Nationalism — i.e., ignoring / suppressing the “serving two masters” axiom fact.13
10. Leaders that promise or pledge billions in aid, sympathy, or support to countries and projects14 without vote, oversight, or critical exposure by a sitting parliament or by a captured, multi- billion-dollar-funded press.15
11. Press Cases:
Case One: CBC Reporter to Mark Carney: [in essence] Will you be revealing your conflicts of interest before the election ...
Mark Carney: “Look within yourself, Rosemary…”16
Case Two: Reporter to Mark Carney: [in essence] Will you repay Canadians your European travel costs?
Mark Carney: [Lengthy word salad at its greenest]
Reporter: I will take that as a “no.”
Mark Carney: “NO. YOU WILL TAKE THAT as a very comprehensive answer to your question.”17
12. A party who, after disqualifying a sitting MP from running for leadership, then disqualifies him from running for re-election in his own riding and parachutes the pretend PM into the Liberal spot on the ballot.18
13. A party leader declines an invitation to attend an up-coming leader’s debate in the French language because of (perhaps?) French insufficiency19 (see point 4 above).
14. A country whose Senate members (chamber of “sober second-thought”) are to represent (in theory) their provinces and regions but who are appointed by the nation’s PM without required reference or preference by the province or region; Senators who are often appointed as a perk for loyalty to the presiding PM’s party.
15. A country whose Senate is composed as in this map.
Canadian Senate Seats by Region Source: thecanadaguide.com
So dear Canadians, let us end this mockery of our damaged, disintegrating, quasi-democracy. Let us reject the past decade of mockery / hypocrisy and give someone else a go at resisting the corruptions of power. And with our NEW MPs, let us keep a Mockery Watch. Call out every case of DeMOCracy / hypocrisy; insist on integrity, fairness, justice, and judgment for both the Right and the Left.
Let’s commit, as an entire nation, to right the wrongs that have evolved within our confederate structure.20 Let us revive the Triple-E Senate21 concept of equal / elected / effective by province / territory. Let us Improve our House of Commons representation by achieving greater accuracy in assessing the number of lawful, citizen voters.22
Let us insist on achieving fair representation. Let us let go of the fight to hold onto power and privilege at the cost of integrity. Let us be as fair to our neighbor as we would wish them to be fair to us.
IMAGE:
Cartoonist: Wm. Charles Morris | 1906-1908
Re-purposed by SMS | 2025
Hatband reads: LIB
Unseen inside hatband:
conspirators, accomplices, perpetrators, sycophants, script-readers
Page URL: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WCMorris_Spokesman-Review_cartoons_124.jpg
File URL: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/69/WCMorris_Spokesman-Review_cartoons_124.jpg
Attribution: William Charles Morris, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Description: Editorial cartoon by William C. Morris.
Date: circa 1906 – 1908
Source: Morris, William Charles (1908) Spokesman-Review Cartoons, Spokane, WA: Review Publishing Company
Permission: This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer
Author: Morris, William Charles 1874-1940
William Charles Morris (March 6, 1874–April 10, 1940) was an American political cartoonist. Born in Salt Lake City, Utah, he began his career with the Salt Lake Herald and later worked as cartoonist with The Spokesman-Review in Spokane, from 1904 to 1913,[1] after which he worked for such publications as New-York Tribune, New York Mail, the George Matthew Adams Syndicate, and Harper's Weekly.[2] He was on the publicity staff of the Republican National Committee during the 1936 presidential campaign. He died of heart attack at Nyack, New York, April 10, 1940, at age 66.[3] | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Charles_Morris
2025 Changes by SMS:
• Removed text: 1) "FOR W.J. BRYAN" from coffin end; 2) "HEARST" from hatband; 3) "News Item — A break has occurred in the former close friendship between Wm. J. Bryan and Wm. R. Hearst"
• Added: 1) Re- to Hearsed (Title); 2) "Canada, 1867-2025 to coffin end; 3} LIB” to hatband. (If the inside of the hatband could be seen, it would read: conspirators, accomplices, perpetrators, sycophants, script-readers); 4) “WEF+” and “Global Services” to hearse side.
Well, it seems that the farce just goes on and on. The drama boy who presided over a recent 21.9 billion deficit overrun,1 continues to hobnob around the world in a last fling of excess and ego — courtesy of a non-resignation that allows him to carry on in scandal-land till the last bitter moment for Canadians who are desperate for accountability that never seems to come. And now, we apparently have a new round of Liberal scandal as they try to cling to power and the public purse — a scandal of fund-raising and smear-mongering by a lapsed corporation; except, one investigative citizen (in the spirit of enduring hope that some authority will finally pay attention and prosecute) has "doxxed" the scam. Begin at min. 2:41 for the dox though the first 2:41 minutes details yet another Liberal scandal.
MASTERMINDS Behind Poilievre's SMEAR Campaigns UNMASKED + Liberals Pay $4M for Cricket Meat in Asia
(Moose on the Loose | Feb 24, 2025 | Time 17:14 min.; doxxing the smear begins circa min. 2:41) at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8QFe8K6CUA&t=737s
So this is the plea to prosecutors and judges:
▪ Defend democracy and the rule of law;
▪ End this mocking of democracy by "power-elites";
▪ Prosecute to the fullest the political / governmental crimes and corruptions that have plagued and harmed Canadians for the past decade;
▪ Insist that NO ONE is above the law.
Well, "American" folks of North America (being Canadians, USians, and Mexicans), before we got to the Tariff Wars, we started with the Gas-lighting War and we, the North and South neighbours, apparently LOST because no one ASKED (including a bevy of reporters crowded before Trump’s new press secretary, Karoline Leavitt): “HOW (in the name of your vaunted common sense) are Canada and Mexico letting illegal immigrants and tons of illicit drugs into the U.S.? Surely in that sardine bunch, someone actually wondered about border protocol, so why, why, why didn’t someone ask:
What do you mean "allow / enable"? Is the U.S. government so short on citizens that they have taken to hiring Canadian and Mexican custom and immigration officers at their ports of entry? Is that how Canada and Mexico are subverting and harming the U.S.?
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Briefs Members of the Media, Jan. 31, 2025
(The White House | Jan 31, 2025 | Time 39:02 min.) at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xpyOSJaxkA
(see at min. mark 14:40: "The president will be implementing tomorrow [25 % tariffs on Mexico and Canada ...] for the illegal fentanyl that they have sourced and allowed to distribute into our country which has killed tens of millions of Americans ..." & at 20:00: "The tariffs are incoming tomorrow on Canada and the reason for that is because both Canada and Mexico have allowed an unprecedented invasion of illegal fentanyl that is killing American citizens and also illegal immigrants into our country. ... Canada Mexico, and China ... have all enabled illegal drugs to pour into America ...")
I live near the border and not once (as a dual) have I been stopped by the Canadian side before presenting myself to the U.S. side (and vice versa), so what is all this “allowed / enabled” accusation? Is Canada supposed to supply the U.S. side with training for detection of terrorists and criminals? with drug-sniffing dogs? with border patrols to prevent people from entering the U.S.? How utterly bizarre to listen to Ms Leavitt allege that Canada's offence is to “allow” illicit drugs and illegals into the U.S. How much is allegedly sourced from Canada? And how much from some of your own U.S. diplomats, CiA, et al. who bring in drugs by the pouch, body bag, and planeload, or are grown / produced on your own soil ? How many criminals and terrorists have waltzed past your airport customs and immigration officers with false or special exemption documents because they were on (secret) USian assignment? There are more USian exposés than time to read them all, shelved under “conspiracy theory” so people ignore or mock them until time and declassification prove them true. Many of these exposés are written by U.S. insiders and patriots with integrity. Many know first hand of U.S. government corruption, crime, and bullying and are distressed by the sense of entitlement, injustice, and violation of Constitution.
Of course, there are millions of great U.S. citizens, but so far, most have allowed / enabled crime and corruption to flourish by pretending it doesn't exist except in the opposing red or blue "team." Unfortunately the same applies to Canada. Our lax enforcement has allowed crime and corruption to flourish, too. We need to clean our Canadian house to be a better neighbour, just as the U.S. does.
So yes, there are undoubtedly “bad guys” in Canada that USians don’t want, just as there are “bad guys” in the U.S. that Canada and Mexico don’t want, but allowing or denying entry to the U.S. is the sole responsibility of U.S. officials.
I had some great hopes that the massive gas-lighting of Biden’s press secretary would be over, but it seems not. Maybe Leavitt is not as transparently egregious, but perhaps more dangerous with the brazen confidence of casting blame (a favored tool of gas-lighters) in with a potpourri of truth, reason, and consequence.
Let us open our eyes and ears, my fellow USians and Canadians: the U.S. is solely responsible for who or what they let into their country. Neither Canada, Mexico, nor China can dictate terms of U.S. entry. We are to protect (and clean up) our side of the border, they, to protect (and clean up) their side, This victim mentality and gas-lighting by this superpower in this border matter is astonishing.
If there were two words to describe what the Liberals and NDP under PM Trudeau have done to Canada over the past nine years, it might be “Snow Job”
1) Snowjob, an American colloquialism for a cover-up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snow_Job
A cover-up is an attempt, whether successful or not, to conceal evidence of wrongdoing, error, incompetence, or other embarrassing information. Research has distinguished personal cover-ups (covering up one's own misdeeds) from relational cover-ups (covering up someone else's misdeeds).[1]
The expression is usually applied to people in positions of authority who abuse power to avoid or silence criticism or to deflect guilt of wrongdoing. Perpetrators of a cover-up (initiators or their allies) may be responsible for a misdeed, a breach of trust or duty, or a crime. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cover-up
Not only have the “powers” ignored or quashed investigations of corruption time after time, but they have voted against Rights and Freedoms and decimated out military. Here is one person’s somewhat mocking observation:
But bear up Canada. The LIB/NDP snow job is about to melt away if we wake-up and make the right choices. Let us resist the newest snow job that the coronation of an elitist, central banker is the answer to Canada's woes. Remember the Dear Fellow Canadians: “Heads Up”* from short months
ago.
let them all, this day, smell the coffee and the coming election catastrophe — a merited catastrophe for aiders and abettors, but a jubilation for Canada and all free-thinking Canadians. The cost Canada has paid and will pay for letting dark-triads1 and flying monkeys2 swing from the rafters of the House is perhaps uncountable.
So, let this December 31, 2024 eulogy posted by Pierre Poilievre be the final spike in the coffin of LIB / NDP crimes, corruptions, conspiracies, and conflicts-of-interest3:
Let us defeat every MP who voted against God-given rights and freedoms, whether affiliating Left, Right, Centre or Far, UNLESS they confess their past errors and commit to serve the PEOPLE.4
Let the election come much sooner than later!!! God willing.
