Them Mocking Us? | Us Doxing Them & Us?

IF the powers are mocking the masses with manipulated statistics of obedience and vaxx compliance so that resisters (against tyranny and power abuse) feel isolated and alone, perhaps the resisting masses could dox the fabrications(?) by wearing a visible symbol of resistance to tyranny — a sort of voluntary inverse of the infamous, historical yellow badges.¹ The masses could choose some form of “smiley face” to flout the brazen cruelty of the mandates, the destructive agendas, the psy-oping, the predictive programming, and the faux(?) numbers — (and also as a belated dox of Canadian PM Trudeau's 2015, promised “sunny ways”²).

Yes, visibly declaring one's resistance to abusive power and control could make one a target for more abuse, but half-a-billion or so global, smiley faces might give every-day witness to the solidarity of those who know what this COVID (and variant) scenario is all about. By all appearances,³ it is about complete and perpetual domination by faux Utopians — those duped, self-deluded purveyors of the recycling mantra “liberty, equality, fraternity” that always delivers the opposite.

So, yes, the smiley faces could mock and dox the power-gain-glory-control-domination fabrications(?) of high compliance, but it could also witness to the world the depth of global resistance to tyranny if we, the masses, could muster the courage to, in essence, visibly dox our commitment to inalienable rights and freedoms by smiling as we plod on discerning, exposing, and prosecuting the lies and crimes against humanity.

-----------------------------------------/
1. Yellow badges (or yellow patches), also referred to as Jewish badges (German: ... Judenstern, lit. 'Jew's star'), are badges that Jews were ordered to wear at various times during the Middle Ages by some caliphates, at various times during the Medieval and early modern period by some European powers, and from 1939–1945 by the Axis powers. The badges served to mark the wearer as a religious or ethnic outsider, and often served as a badge of shame.[1] From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_badge
2. Federal Election 2015: "Sunny Ways, Sunny Ways" Justin Trudeau celebrates victory
(Global News | Oct 19, 2015 | .52 min.) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yjk1P4wEK9c
Also: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/ns-prof-trudeau-sunny-ways-1.3280693
3. Just a few samples of many possible:
● Dancing police, medics, etc.: https://moc-n-dox.blogspot.com/2021/03/mocking-us-doxing-them.html
● The Druthers Alternative Newspaper: https://druthers.net/
● The Children's Health Defense: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/
● GeoengineeringWatch (Dane Wigington): https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
● HugoTalks: https://hugotalks.com/
● Last American Vagabond: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/
● David Cullen: https://computingforever.com/  |  https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=computing%20forever&kind=video&sort=new
● Ice Age Farmer: https://www.iceagefarmer.com/ | https://www.youtube.com/c/IceAgeFarmer/videos
● Elevated PCR cycle Thresholds: PCR Testing Saga: Were We Duped? Were federal health officials and experts at WHO really unaware that the recommended high cycle count (CT) for PCR tests would produce an exorbitant number of false positives for COVID? by Dr. Joseph Mercola (Childrens' Health Defense | Feb. 23, 2021) https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pcr-testing-incorrect-use/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=b2c12bbb-ac81-4cb4-9987-6f4bd15c26f0
PCR Cycle Thresholds: (Bold emphasis added.)
“The FDA has given lab manufacturers a wide latitude in determining the cycle threshold cut-off number of their qualitative tests to determine positive versus negative. These tests were approved under Emergency Use Authorization and have not been subjected to typical FDA scrutiny. With this in mind, the state of Florida has required all laboratories doing COVID testing to report the cycle threshold numbers used in qualitative and quantitative tests.
“So how does a qualitative RT-PCR test work? Basically, the manufacturer sets the test to turn off the cycling or amplification process when a certain number is hit. For a qualitative test set at 40, after 40 amplification cycles, if any viral material is detected, it turns off and is reported as positive. If none is detected, it would be reported as negative. If the number of amplification cycles was really 15 or 25, it would still run until it gets to 40 and be reported as positive.
“With these type of tests, it's critical to use an agreed-upon cycle threshold value such as 33 (CDC) or 35 (Dr. Fauci) rather than setting it at a potentially misleading 40 or 45. Many of the current tests in use are preset by the manufacturer to these higher numbers. “The World Health Organization issued a notice last week telling the labs "the cut-off should be manually adjusted to ensure that specimens with high Ct values are not incorrectly assigned SARS-CoV-2 detected due to background noise." Could this be a reason why many people test positive but remain asymptomatic? In that same memo, WHO said all labs should report the cycle threshold value to treating physicians.” at https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90508
● Etc., etc. etc.